Portal de Boas Práticas em Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente

Busca Global no Portal

Foram encontrados: 3222 Resultados

Although the rising pandemic of obesity has received major attention in many countries, the effects of this attention on trends and the disease burden of obesity remain uncertain. METHODS: We analyzed data from 68.5 million persons to assess the trends in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among children and adults between 1980 and 2015. Using the Global Burden of Disease study data and methods, we also quantified the burden of disease related to high body-mass index (BMI), according to age, sex, cause, and BMI in 195 countries between 1990 and 2015. RESULTS: In 2015, a total of 107.7 million children and 603.7 million adults were obese. Since 1980, the prevalence of obesity has doubled in more than 70 countries and has continuously increased in most other countries. Although the prevalence of obesity among children has been lower than that among adults, the rate of increase in childhood obesity in many countries has been greater than the rate of increase in adult obesity. High BMI accounted for 4.0 million deaths globally, nearly 40% of which occurred in persons who were not obese. More than two thirds of deaths related to high BMI were due to cardiovascular disease. The disease burden related to high BMI has increased since 1990; however, the rate of this increase has been attenuated owing to decreases in underlying rates of death from cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid increase in the prevalence and disease burden of elevated BMI highlights the need for continued focus on surveillance of BMI and identification, implementation, and evaluation of evidence-based interventions to address this problem. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.).
Nas últimas três décadas, o Brasil experimentou sucessivas transformações nos determinantes sociais das doenças e na organização dos serviços de saúde. Neste artigo, examinamos como essas mudanças afetaram os indicadores de saúde materna e de saúde e nutrição infantil. São utilizados dados de estatísticas vitais, censos populacionais, inquéritos de demografia e saúde e publicações obtidas de diversas outras fontes. Nesse período, os coeficientes de mortalidade infantil foram substancialmente reduzidos, com taxa anual de decréscimo de 5,5% nas décadas de 1980 e 1990 e 4,4% no período 2000-08, atingindo vinte mortes por 1.000 nascidos vivos em 2008. As mortes neonatais foram responsáveis por 68% das mortes infantis. Deficits de altura entre crianças menores de 5 anos diminuíram de 37%, em 1974-75, para 7%, em 2006-07. As diferenças regionais referentes aos deficits de altura e à mortalidade de crianças foram igualmente reduzidas. O acesso à maioria das intervenções de saúde dirigidas às mães e às crianças foi substancialmente ampliado, quase atingindo coberturas universais, e as desigualdades regionais de acesso a tais intervenções foram notavelmente reduzidas. A duração mediana da amamentação aumentou de 2,5 meses nos anos 1970 para 14 meses em 2006-07. Estatísticas oficiais revelam níveis estáveis de mortalidade materna durante os últimos quinze anos, mas estimativas baseadas em modelos estatísticos indicam uma redução anual de 4%, uma tendência que pode não ter sido observada nos dados de registro devido às melhorias no sistema de notificação de óbitos e à ampliação das investigações sobre óbitos de mulheres em idade reprodutiva. As razões para o progresso alcançado pelo Brasil incluem: modificações socioeconômicas e demográficas (crescimento econômico, redução das disparidades de renda entre as populações mais ricas e mais pobres, urbanização, melhoria na educação das mulheres e redução nas taxas de fecundidade); intervenções externas ao setor de saúde (programas condicionais de transferência de renda e melhorias no sistema de água e saneamento); programas verticais de saúde nos anos 1980 (promoção da amamentação, hidratação oral e imunizações); criação do Sistema Nacional de Saúde (SUS), mantido por impostos e contribuições sociais, cuja cobertura foi expandida para atingir as áreas mais pobres do país por intermédio do Programa de Saúde da Família, na metade dos anos 1990; e a implementação de vários programas nacionais e estaduais para melhoria da saúde e nutrição infantil e, em menor grau, para a promoção da saúde das mulheres. Apesar dos muitos progressos, desafios importantes ainda persistem, incluindo a medicalização abusiva (quase 50% dos nascimentos ocorrem por cesariana), mortes maternas causadas por abortos inseguros e a alta frequência de nascimentos pré-termo.
Background Midwives are primar y providers of care for childbearing women around the world. However, th ere is a lack of synthesised informationto establish wheth er there are differences in morbidity and mortality, effectiveness and psychosocial outcomes between midwife-ledcontinuity models and othe r models of care.ObjectivesTo compare midwife-led continuity models of care with other models of care for childbearing women and their infants.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Gr oup’s Trials Register (25 January 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies.Selection criteriaAll published and unpublished trials in which pregnant women are randomly al located to midwife-led continuity models of care orother model s of care during pregnancy and birth.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them f or accuracy. Thequality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.Main resultsWe included 15 trials involving 17,674 women. We assessed th e quality of the trial evidence for all primary outcomes (i.e. regionalanalgesia (e pidural/spinal), caesarean birth, instrumental vaginal birth (forceps/vacuum), spontaneous vaginal birth, intact perineum,preterm birth (less than 37 weeks) and all fetal loss before and afte r 24 weeks plus neonatal death using the GRADE methodology: allprimary outcomes were graded as of high quality.For the primary outcomes, women who had midwife-led continuity model s of care were less likely to experience regional analgesia(average risk ratio (RR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 0.92; participants = 17,674; studies = 14; high quality), instrumental vaginal birth (average RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.97; participants = 17,501; studies = 13; high quality), preterm birth less than 37weeks (average RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.91; participants = 13,238; studies = eight; high quality) and less all fetal loss before andafter 24 weeks plus neonatal death (average RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.99; participants = 17,561; studies = 13; high quality evidence).Women who had midwife-led continuity models of care were more likely to experience spontaneous vaginal birth (average RR 1.05,95% CI 1.03 to 1.07; par ticipants = 16,687; studies = 12; high quality). There were no diffe rences between groups for caesarean birthsor intact perineum.For the secondary outcomes, women who had midwife-led continuity models of care were less likely to experience amniotomy (averageRR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.98; participants = 3253; studies = four), e pisiotomy (average RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.92; participants= 17,674; studies = 14) and fetal loss less than 24 weeks and neonatal death (average RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.98; participants =15,645; studies = 11). Women who had midwife-led continuity models of care were more likely to experience no intrapartum analgesia/anaesthesia (average RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.37; participants = 10,499; studies = se ven), have a longer mean le ngth of labour(hours) (mean difference (MD) 0.50, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.74; participants = 3328; studies = three) and more likely to be attended atbirth by a known midwife (average RR 7.04, 95% CI 4.48 to 11.08; participants = 6917; studies = seven). The re were no differencesbetween groups for fetal loss equal to/after 24 weeks and neonatal death, induction of l abour, antenatal hospitalisation, antepartumhaemorrhage, augmentation/artificial oxytocin during labour, opiate analgesia, perineal laceration requiring suturing, postpartumhaemorrhage, breastfeeding initiation, l ow birthweight infant, five-minute Apgar score less th an or equal to seven, neonatal convulsions,admission of infant to special care or neonatal intensive care unit(s) or in mean length of neonatal hospital stay (days).Due to a lack of consistency in measuring women’s satisfaction and assessing the cost of various maternity models, these outcomes wererepor ted narratively. The majority of included studies reported a higher rate of maternal satisfaction in midwife-le d continuity modelsof care. Similarly, there was a trend towards a cost-saving effect for midwife-led continuity care compared to othe r care models.Authors’ conclusionsThis review suggests that women who received midwife-led continuity models of care were less likely to experience intervention andmore likely to be satisfied with their care with at least comparable adverse outcomes for women or their infants than women whoreceived other models of care.Further research is needed to explore findings of fewer preterm births and fewer fetal de ath s less than 24 weeks, and all fetal loss/neonatal death associated with midwife-led continuity model s of care.
In this fi rst paper in a series of four papers on midwifery, we aimed to examine, comprehensively and systematically, the contribution midwifery can make to the quality of care of women and infants globally, and the role of midwives and others in providing midwifery care. Drawing on international defi nitions and current practice, we mapped the scope of midwifery. We then developed a framework for quality maternal and newborn care using a mixed-methods approach including synthesis of fi ndings from systematic reviews of women’s views and experiences, eff ective practices, and maternal and newborn care providers. The framework diff erentiates between what care is provided and how and by whom it is provided, and describes the care and services that childbearing women and newborn infants need in all settings. We identifi ed more than 50 short-term, medium-term, and long-term outcomes that could be improved by care within the scope of midwifery; reduced maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity, reduced stillbirth and preterm birth, decreased number of unnecessary interventions, and improved psychosocial and public health outcomes. Midwifery was associated with more effi cient use of resources and improved outcomes when provided by midwives who were educated, trained, licensed, and regulated. Our fi ndings support a system-level shift from maternal and newborn care focused on identifi cation and treatment of pathology for the minority to skilled care for all. This change includes preventive and supportive care that works to strengthen women’s capabilities in the context of respectful relationships, is tailored to their needs, focuses on promotion of normal reproductive processes, and in which fi rst-line management of complications and accessible emergency treatment are provided when needed. Midwifery is pivotal to this approach, which requires eff ective interdisciplinary teamwork and integration across facility and community settings. Future planning for maternal and newborn care systems can benefi t from using the quality framework in planning workforce development and resource allocation.